As we all know, the 55-inch is the critical point of full HD, and there are more or less obvious graininess. So is it necessary for the micro-whale to release a 43-inch first small-size 4k TV on November 19th?
Currently on the market there are 40 or so TVs, the screen resolution is 1080P as the mainstream standard, and the micro whale unconventional, the introduction of 43-inch smart TV with 4K resolution, the intention can be imagined, "the first The 43-inch true 4K screen smart TV sounds very good and tall. However, abandoning the gimmick, returning to the real, small-size smart TV, really need 4K so high-definition resolution? 43-inch TV screen, 1080P resolution and 3840P resolution, the naked eye can really see the difference between it?
First of all, we need to understand the concept of full HD and ultra high definition:
The common 4K resolutions today are 4096216 and 38402160. The former is mainly used in digital cinema, while the latter is mostly used in 4K TVs or 4K displays. TVs or displays with 38402160 resolution are also called UHDTV standard products. The UHDTV standard was developed by the International Telecommunications Union and its full name is Ultra High Definition Television. Compared with 1920-1080 resolution Full Full Definition Television (FHDTV), UHDTV resolution is just four times that of FHDTV, and can display finer images with the same screen size, and because of the same aspect ratio. At 16:9, UHDTV standard products are also very compatible with FHDTV images and are more easily accepted by consumers.
Since 4K resolution is 4 times the resolution of HDTV, every detail in the picture is more delicate than 2K. The movie is colorful and the text is clear and sharp. So why differentiate the size of the screen?
The reason is that this is related to the person's perspective and the distance to the screen.
For example, one difference between iPad2 and iPad3 is the improvement of resolution, iPad2 is 1024X768 resolution, and iPad3 is 2048×1530 resolution, which can clearly feel the sharpness when observing the interface between the two at close range. difference. However, standing half a meter away from the naked eye, it is impossible to distinguish the iPad 2/3.
It is because people's angle of observation and distance are limited. If you are looking into the distance, you will find that the sharpness can be clearly observed.
Back to the original question, as a critical point, TVs under 55 inches, people's naked eye is not easy to distinguish the difference between 2K and 4K, not to mention that we still need to stand half a meter away to watch TV, then 43-inch intelligence Television, 4K resolution picture definition, color details, although more realistic than 2K resolution, but watching television in front of the TV we have been difficult to tell.
It is speculated that a small-size TV with a size of 43 inches, 1080P resolution is enough to use, and the screen with 4K-level resolution will be a little bit extra.
At the same time, it also shows that from a theoretical point of view, the 4K resolution below 55 inches will not be too much.
At the same time, in order to achieve the 4K ultra-high-definition picture quality, it also needs strong hardware support. The refresh rate of the 4K image is 60 Hz. To output a 4K resolution with a refresh rate of 60 Hz, it is necessary to satisfy a chip processor that simultaneously supports a 4K refresh rate, and enough HDMI 2.0 or more transmission. This is why, the microwhale will choose MStar 6A928 as the 43-inch WTV43K1 processor. The strongest chip in smart TVs in 2015 was MStar's MSD6A928, which uses a quad-core ARM Cortex-A17 design to run smoothly all existing applications. With super 4K decoding capability.
It must be said here that the micro-whale is also concentrating on television. As a 4K TV screen with a small size, although the effect of the 4K screen is not particularly noticeable with the naked eye compared to other TVs of the same size, the 4K screen still uses the current TV to achieve sufficient 4K output. The top chip processor solutions, at the same time, are not much more expensive than the other similarly sized TVs on the market, such as the Kukai A43 and LeTV 3 X43. They are indeed conscience products. Price, the small whale cannon is 2098 yuan (including a year membership); cool open A43: 1999 yuan; music as ultra 3 X43: 1899 (including one month membership)
In conclusion, as a price, there is no 43-inch TV higher than other brands in the same industry. Although the 4K image effect does not look so obvious to the naked eye, “there are better than noneâ€. This bright spot is sufficient for many standard 2K TVs. Stand out, whether it is necessary or not, but I have, this is enough. In addition, MStar 6A928, with its current market prospects, is escorting it. Highly-configured, cost-effective TV is a TV worth buying.
Currently on the market there are 40 or so TVs, the screen resolution is 1080P as the mainstream standard, and the micro whale unconventional, the introduction of 43-inch smart TV with 4K resolution, the intention can be imagined, "the first The 43-inch true 4K screen smart TV sounds very good and tall. However, abandoning the gimmick, returning to the real, small-size smart TV, really need 4K so high-definition resolution? 43-inch TV screen, 1080P resolution and 3840P resolution, the naked eye can really see the difference between it?
First of all, we need to understand the concept of full HD and ultra high definition:
The common 4K resolutions today are 4096216 and 38402160. The former is mainly used in digital cinema, while the latter is mostly used in 4K TVs or 4K displays. TVs or displays with 38402160 resolution are also called UHDTV standard products. The UHDTV standard was developed by the International Telecommunications Union and its full name is Ultra High Definition Television. Compared with 1920-1080 resolution Full Full Definition Television (FHDTV), UHDTV resolution is just four times that of FHDTV, and can display finer images with the same screen size, and because of the same aspect ratio. At 16:9, UHDTV standard products are also very compatible with FHDTV images and are more easily accepted by consumers.
Since 4K resolution is 4 times the resolution of HDTV, every detail in the picture is more delicate than 2K. The movie is colorful and the text is clear and sharp. So why differentiate the size of the screen?
The reason is that this is related to the person's perspective and the distance to the screen.
For example, one difference between iPad2 and iPad3 is the improvement of resolution, iPad2 is 1024X768 resolution, and iPad3 is 2048×1530 resolution, which can clearly feel the sharpness when observing the interface between the two at close range. difference. However, standing half a meter away from the naked eye, it is impossible to distinguish the iPad 2/3.
It is speculated that a small-size TV with a size of 43 inches, 1080P resolution is enough to use, and the screen with 4K-level resolution will be a little bit extra.
At the same time, it also shows that from a theoretical point of view, the 4K resolution below 55 inches will not be too much.
At the same time, in order to achieve the 4K ultra-high-definition picture quality, it also needs strong hardware support. The refresh rate of the 4K image is 60 Hz. To output a 4K resolution with a refresh rate of 60 Hz, it is necessary to satisfy a chip processor that simultaneously supports a 4K refresh rate, and enough HDMI 2.0 or more transmission. This is why, the microwhale will choose MStar 6A928 as the 43-inch WTV43K1 processor. The strongest chip in smart TVs in 2015 was MStar's MSD6A928, which uses a quad-core ARM Cortex-A17 design to run smoothly all existing applications. With super 4K decoding capability.
It must be said here that the micro-whale is also concentrating on television. As a 4K TV screen with a small size, although the effect of the 4K screen is not particularly noticeable with the naked eye compared to other TVs of the same size, the 4K screen still uses the current TV to achieve sufficient 4K output. The top chip processor solutions, at the same time, are not much more expensive than the other similarly sized TVs on the market, such as the Kukai A43 and LeTV 3 X43. They are indeed conscience products. Price, the small whale cannon is 2098 yuan (including a year membership); cool open A43: 1999 yuan; music as ultra 3 X43: 1899 (including one month membership)
In conclusion, as a price, there is no 43-inch TV higher than other brands in the same industry. Although the 4K image effect does not look so obvious to the naked eye, “there are better than noneâ€. This bright spot is sufficient for many standard 2K TVs. Stand out, whether it is necessary or not, but I have, this is enough. In addition, MStar 6A928, with its current market prospects, is escorting it. Highly-configured, cost-effective TV is a TV worth buying.
Variable Rf Attenuator,Waveguide Fixed Attenuator,Fixed Attenuator In Microwave,Fixed And Variable Attenuator In Microwave
Chengdu Zysen Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.zysenmw.com